Apollo Go vs Segway E3 Pro: Which Should You Buy? (2026)

Side by side

	Apollo Go 62	Segway E3 Pro 51
Motor & speed
Top speed (claimed)	28 mph✓	20 mph
Peak power	—	800 W
Nominal power	1500 W	—
Drive	Dual motor✓	Single motor
Max incline	46.6%	—
Battery & range
Claimed range	36 mi✓	34 mi
Est. real-world range	20–25 mi✓	19–24 mi
Battery	540 Wh	—
Charge time	7.5 h	5.5 h✓
Build
Weight	49 lb	40.1 lb✓
Max load	265 lb	265 lb
Suspension	dual	dual
Brakes	Rear Drum + Power RBS™ (regenerative braking)	—
Water resistance	IP66	IPX5
Tyres	9" tubeless	10" tubeless
Features
Score (within category)	62/100✓	51/100
Price	$849	$600✓

A green ✓ marks the better figure on that row. “—” means the manufacturer does not publish it; a blank is never counted as a loss. Scores compare each model within its own category.

What the makers don't publish

Apollo does not publish peak power for the Apollo Go — 1 of the 15 specifications we track. Segway (Ninebot) does not publish nominal power, battery capacity, system voltage, climbing grade, and brake hardware for the Segway E3 Pro — 5 of the 15 specifications we track. We show a dash for each of those rather than estimate, and a missing figure is never counted against a scooter in our scoring — the component is dropped and the remaining weights renormalise. Because both sheets have holes, several rows of the table above cannot be compared at all, so treat this as a comparison of what is published rather than a complete picture. If one of the unpublished figures is the one your decision turns on, ask the seller in writing before you buy: a maker that measures a specification usually states it, and silence is a reasonable prompt to look harder.

Motor & speed

The Apollo Go is the faster of the pair, 28 mph against 20 mph — a 8 mph gap that shows on open stretches but rarely in traffic, where junctions and shared paths set the pace regardless of what the scooter can do. At the Go's speeds, braking matters more than the extra miles per hour: check the build section below, because stopping distance climbs faster than speed does. The Apollo Go carries more motor on paper, and that surplus shows up in acceleration and on climbs rather than in a higher cruising speed — the place a stronger motor actually earns its keep is the hill you take twice a day. Only the Apollo Go runs dual motors, which trade some weight and battery drain for noticeably stronger grip and pull, especially on loose or wet ground — useful if your route is anything but smooth, wasteful if it is. Read any top-speed figure as a maximum reached under ideal conditions; rider weight and gradient both pull it down in the real world, so treat these numbers as a ceiling rather than a cruising promise.

Battery & range

Both claims deserve the usual discount. The Go's 36-mile figure realistically works out to about 20–25 miles once you account for a normal rider at real speeds; the E3 Pro's 34 lands at roughly 19–24. Plan around the lower end of whichever band matters to you: if your daily round trip does not fit inside it with margin to spare, the range difference here is the deciding factor and you should pick the bigger battery. Recharging also differs: the Segway E3 Pro is back to full in about 5.5 hours against 7.5, which matters if you top up between a morning and evening commute rather than overnight. Whichever you choose, remember that both figures assume a fresh battery; a pack loses roughly 20–30% of its capacity after a couple of years of daily cycling, so a used example of either will fall short of these numbers.

Build & ride

Weight is where the daily reality lives: 49 lb against 40.1 lb, a 8.9 lb difference. If you carry the scooter up stairs or onto a train, the lighter Segway E3 Pro is the one you will actually keep using — the difference between a scooter that gets ridden and one that gathers dust is often a single flight of steps. Both run suspension at both ends, so both should ride comfortably over broken ground — a genuine point in common rather than a tie-breaker. Each publishes a water-resistance rating (IP66 and IPX5); the higher of the two shrugs off heavier rain, though neither should be ridden through standing water or pressure-washed.

Price, score & value

The Segway E3 Pro is the cheaper of the two, $600 against $849 — a $249 gap. Whether that gap is worth closing depends entirely on whether the pricier scooter's advantages above line up with your priorities. Within their category the Apollo Go scores higher (62/100 to 51/100). Remember that our scores are within-category judgements — this comparison is only meaningful because both sit in the same or an adjacent class. If value per dollar is your lens, use the cost-of-ownership calculator on this site: a slightly cheaper scooter with pneumatic tyres can cost more to run over a few years than a pricier one on solid tyres, and the sticker price alone hides that.

What the extra $249 buys

What these numbers actually govern

Here is what each of these measures controls in general — both the ones that separate these two and the ones they share. These describe the measure, not a claim about how either scooter rides, which we have not tested.

drive

A second motor adds traction and acceleration at the cost of weight and battery drain — the trade is worth it on loose or steep ground and wasteful on flat pavement.

price

Price is the one figure that is not a specification — it moves with stock and promotions, so treat any gap as current rather than permanent.

top speed

A top-speed figure is a ceiling reached under ideal conditions; rider weight and gradient both pull it down, so it describes headroom rather than a cruising promise.

charge time

Charge time matters most if you top up between a morning and an evening commute rather than overnight.

water resistance

An IP rating describes water resistance, not immersion — it covers rain and splashes, never standing water or a pressure washer.

Max load (both 265 lb)identical on both

A load rating covers rider plus cargo, not the rider alone. Where both models publish the same limit, rider weight cannot separate them.

Suspension (both dual)identical on both

Suspension is the component that most changes how a scooter handles broken pavement; where both models carry the same arrangement, road comfort is not a differentiator between them.

Tyre type (both tubeless)identical on both

Pneumatic and tubeless tyres absorb road imperfections that solid tyres pass into the deck; solid tyres trade that comfort for never puncturing. A shared construction means the same trade on both.

Price & where to buy

Who should buy which

Buy the Apollo Go if you want dual motors for traction and pull, or you want the faster ride (28 mph vs 20 mph — a clear 29% edge). Buy the Segway E3 Pro if you want to spend less ($600 vs $849), or you top up between commutes rather than overnight (5.5 h vs 7.5 h). Whichever you pick, 3 specifications are identical across both — max load, suspension, tyre type — so those rows cannot decide it. Within their category our score puts the Apollo Go at 62/100 against 51/100.

Bottom line: the Apollo Go is the safer default here — it runs dual motors. The Segway E3 Pro earns its place if less ($600 vs $849) matters more to you. Every figure here is the manufacturer's published claim or a value we compute from it, linked back to each maker's own specification so you can check it yourself.

Frequently asked questions