GOTRAX G3 MAX vs NIU KQi 300P: Which Should You Buy? (2026)
The GOTRAX G3 MAX and the NIU KQi 300P land close enough on price and class to be genuine cross-shops — $395 against $599, sitting in adjacent tiers (budget and commuter). Every figure below is the manufacturer's published claim or a value we compute from it; where a maker leaves a spec unpublished we show a dash rather than guess, and a blank is never counted against a scooter. One habit to carry into any range comparison is to halve the claim. The G3 MAX claims 37 miles but realistically returns about 20–26; the KQi 300P's 30-mile claim works out to roughly 17–21. The sections that follow work through where each one leads, and the verdict above already names the pick for most buyers — the detail below is there to overturn it if your priorities differ.
Side by side
| Motor & speed | ||
| Top speed (claimed) | 17 mph | 20 mph✓ |
| Peak power | — | 900 W |
| Nominal power | 350 W | 450 W✓ |
| Drive | Single motor | Single motor |
| Max incline | — | 20% |
| Battery & range | ||
| Claimed range | 37 mi✓ | 30 mi |
| Est. real-world range | 20–26 mi✓ | 17–21 mi |
| Battery | 490 Wh✓ | 487 Wh |
| Charge time | — | 5 h |
| Build | ||
| Weight | — | 45.97 lb |
| Max load | 264 lb | 265 lb✓ |
| Suspension | — | dual |
| Brakes | — | Dual disc front & rear + regenerative |
| Water resistance | — | IP55 |
| Tyres | — | 10.5" tubeless |
| Features | ||
| Score (within category) | 89/100✓ | 52/100 |
| Price | $395✓ | $599 |
A green ✓ marks the better figure on that row. “—” means the manufacturer does not publish it; a blank is never counted as a loss. Scores compare each model within its own category.
What the makers don't publish
GOTRAX does not publish peak power, charge time, weight, climbing grade, tyre size, tyre type, suspension, brake hardware, and water rating for the GOTRAX G3 MAX — 9 of the 15 specifications we track. NIU publishes every specification we track for the NIU KQi 300P. We show a dash for each of those rather than estimate, and a missing figure is never counted against a scooter in our scoring — the component is dropped and the remaining weights renormalise. Those rows cannot be compared head to head, so treat this as a comparison of what is published rather than a complete picture. If one of the unpublished figures is the one your decision turns on, ask the seller in writing before you buy: a maker that measures a specification usually states it, and silence is a reasonable prompt to look harder.
Motor & speed
The NIU KQi 300P is the faster of the pair, 20 mph against 17 mph — a 3 mph gap that shows on open stretches but rarely in traffic, where junctions and shared paths set the pace regardless of what the scooter can do. The NIU KQi 300P carries more motor on paper, and that surplus shows up in acceleration and on climbs rather than in a higher cruising speed — the place a stronger motor actually earns its keep is the hill you take twice a day. Read any top-speed figure as a maximum reached under ideal conditions; rider weight and gradient both pull it down in the real world, so treat these numbers as a ceiling rather than a cruising promise.
Battery & range
Battery capacity is the honest way to compare range, because watt-hours cannot be marketed around: the G3 MAX holds 490 Wh and the KQi 300P 487 Wh. The GOTRAX G3 MAX's 1% larger pack will out-last the other on the same route whatever the two brochures claim, and it is the single number to trust most in this section. Both claims deserve the usual discount. The G3 MAX's 37-mile figure realistically works out to about 20–26 miles once you account for a normal rider at real speeds; the KQi 300P's 30 lands at roughly 17–21. Plan around the lower end of whichever band matters to you: if your daily round trip does not fit inside it with margin to spare, the range difference here is the deciding factor and you should pick the bigger battery. Whichever you choose, remember that both figures assume a fresh battery; a pack loses roughly 20–30% of its capacity after a couple of years of daily cycling, so a used example of either will fall short of these numbers.
Build & ride
Only the NIU KQi 300P has suspension at both ends, the single upgrade that most changes how a scooter feels on cracked city pavement; the other leans on its tyres to take the edge off, which works but not as well. Only the NIU KQi 300P publishes a water rating (IP55). The other maker's silence is not proof of a bad seal, but a manufacturer that tests for water ingress usually states the result — so treat the gap as a reason for caution in the wet.
Price, score & value
The GOTRAX G3 MAX is the cheaper of the two, $395 against $599 — a $204 gap. Whether that gap is worth closing depends entirely on whether the pricier scooter's advantages above line up with your priorities. Within their category the GOTRAX G3 MAX scores higher (89/100 to 52/100). Remember that our scores are within-category judgements — this comparison is only meaningful because both sit in the same or an adjacent class. If value per dollar is your lens, use the cost-of-ownership calculator on this site: a slightly cheaper scooter with pneumatic tyres can cost more to run over a few years than a pricier one on solid tyres, and the sticker price alone hides that.
What the extra $204 buys
The NIU KQi 300P costs $204 more. That buys:
- suspension: dual vs none
- nominal power: 450 W vs 350 W
- water resistance: IP55 vs none published
- top speed: 20 mph vs 17 mph
- max load: 265 lb vs 264 lb
- claimed range: 37 mi vs 30 mi
- battery capacity: 490 Wh vs 487 Wh
It does not buy:
- voltage (both 48 V)
- drive (both Single motor)
Where the G3 MAX wins
The GOTRAX G3 MAX costs less ($395 vs $599), claims more range (37 mi vs 30 mi), and carries the bigger battery (490 Wh vs 487 Wh). That is a meaningful spread of advantages, not a single headline number.
Where the KQi 300P wins
The NIU KQi 300P has more suspension (dual vs none), carries more nominal power (450 W vs 350 W), is better sealed against water (IP55 vs none published), is faster (20 mph vs 17 mph), and takes a heavier load (265 lb vs 264 lb). Together those make it the stronger sheet in several areas.
What these numbers actually govern
Here is what each of these measures controls in general — both the ones that separate these two and the ones they share. These describe the measure, not a claim about how either scooter rides, which we have not tested.
- price
- Price is the one figure that is not a specification — it moves with stock and promotions, so treat any gap as current rather than permanent.
- suspension
- Suspension at both ends changes how a scooter handles broken pavement more than any other single component; a single unit covers one end only, and none leaves the tyres to do the work.
- nominal power
- Nominal power describes sustained output: it shows up in acceleration and in holding speed on a long climb rather than in a higher top speed.
- water resistance
- An IP rating describes water resistance, not immersion — it covers rain and splashes, never standing water or a pressure washer.
- claimed range
- Every claimed range figure is measured at a light rider weight, a low constant speed and on flat ground, which is why we show a computed real-world band beside it.
- Drive (both Single motor)identical on both
- A second motor adds traction and acceleration at the cost of weight and battery drain. Where both use the same arrangement, drive layout is not a separator.
Price & where to buy
Prices are snapshots from our tracker and can change. We may earn a commission on purchases made through these links — this never affects rankings.
Prices are snapshots from our tracker and can change. We may earn a commission on purchases made through these links — this never affects rankings.
Who should buy which
Buy the GOTRAX G3 MAX if you want to spend less ($395 vs $599), or your trips are longer and range decides it (37 mi vs 30 mi claimed — a clear 19% edge). Buy the NIU KQi 300P if your roads are rough (dual suspension vs none), or you want more sustained power (450 W vs 350 W — a clear 22% edge). Whichever you pick, 2 specifications are identical across both — voltage, drive — so those rows cannot decide it. Within their category our score puts the GOTRAX G3 MAX at 89/100 against 52/100.
Bottom line: the GOTRAX G3 MAX is the safer default here — it costs less ($395 vs $599). The NIU KQi 300P earns its place if more suspension (dual vs none) matters more to you. Every figure here is the manufacturer's published claim or a value we compute from it, linked back to each maker's own specification so you can check it yourself.
Frequently asked questions
Is the GOTRAX G3 MAX or the NIU KQi 300P better overall?
Within their category, the GOTRAX G3 MAX scores 89/100 and the NIU KQi 300P scores 52/100. Our scores compare models within their own category, and the two are close enough here that your priorities — carry weight, range, price — should decide it rather than the raw number.
Which one has better real-world range?
Estimated at 55–70% of the claim, the G3 MAX works out to about 20–26 miles and the KQi 300P to about 17–21. The one with the larger battery (490 Wh vs 487 Wh) holds its distance better under load.
Which is cheaper to buy?
The GOTRAX G3 MAX is the cheaper of the two at $395 against $599. Prices are tracked snapshots and can change — check the current figure on each model's page before buying.
Which is easier to carry and store?
At least one of these does not publish a weight on its official page, so we cannot compare carry weight directly. Weight is the specification buyers most often regret ignoring, so confirm it before you commit.
Can I ride either one in the rain?
Only the NIU KQi 300P publishes a water-resistance rating (IP55); the other does not, which is a reason for caution if you ride in the wet.
Full specifications and sources: GOTRAX G3 MAX · NIU KQi 300P