Apollo Phantom 2.0 Stellar (60V) vs Dualtron Victor Luxury 2.0: Which Should You Buy? (2026)

Side by side

	Apollo Phantom 2.0 Stellar (60V) 60	Dualtron Victor Luxury 2.0 70
Motor & speed
Top speed (claimed)	53 mph✓	48 mph
Peak power	7000 W	—
Nominal power	6700 W✓	4250 W
Drive	Dual motor	Dual motor
Max incline	46.6%✓	43%
Battery & range
Claimed range	56 mi	60 mi✓
Est. real-world range	31–39 mi	33–42 mi✓
Battery	1800 Wh	1890 Wh✓
Charge time	10 h	4 h✓
Build
Weight	107 lb	82 lb✓
Max load	330 lb✓	265 lb
Suspension	dual	dual
Brakes	Advanced Hydraulic 4-Piston brakes + Power RBS™ (regenerativ	Dual-piston hydraulic disc + ABS/EBS
Water resistance	IP66	IPX5
Tyres	11" tubeless	10" pneumatic
Features
Score (within category)	60/100	70/100✓
Price	$2,799	$1,999✓

A green ✓ marks the better figure on that row. “—” means the manufacturer does not publish it; a blank is never counted as a loss. Scores compare each model within its own category.

What the makers don't publish

Apollo publishes every specification we track for the Apollo Phantom 2.0 Stellar (60V). Dualtron (Minimotors) does not publish peak power for the Dualtron Victor Luxury 2.0 — 1 of the 15 specifications we track. We show a dash for each of those rather than estimate, and a missing figure is never counted against a scooter in our scoring — the component is dropped and the remaining weights renormalise. Those rows cannot be compared head to head, so treat this as a comparison of what is published rather than a complete picture. If one of the unpublished figures is the one your decision turns on, ask the seller in writing before you buy: a maker that measures a specification usually states it, and silence is a reasonable prompt to look harder.

Motor & speed

The Apollo Phantom 2.0 Stellar (60V) is the faster of the pair, 53 mph against 48 mph — a 5 mph gap that shows on open stretches but rarely in traffic, where junctions and shared paths set the pace regardless of what the scooter can do. At the Phantom 2.0 Stellar (60V)'s speeds, braking matters more than the extra miles per hour: check the build section below, because stopping distance climbs faster than speed does. The Apollo Phantom 2.0 Stellar (60V) carries more motor on paper, and that surplus shows up in acceleration and on climbs rather than in a higher cruising speed — the place a stronger motor actually earns its keep is the hill you take twice a day. Read any top-speed figure as a maximum reached under ideal conditions; rider weight and gradient both pull it down in the real world, so treat these numbers as a ceiling rather than a cruising promise.

Battery & range

Battery capacity is the honest way to compare range, because watt-hours cannot be marketed around: the Phantom 2.0 Stellar (60V) holds 1800 Wh and the Victor Luxury 2.0 1890 Wh. The Dualtron Victor Luxury 2.0's 5% larger pack will out-last the other on the same route whatever the two brochures claim, and it is the single number to trust most in this section. Both claims deserve the usual discount. The Phantom 2.0 Stellar (60V)'s 56-mile figure realistically works out to about 31–39 miles once you account for a normal rider at real speeds; the Victor Luxury 2.0's 60 lands at roughly 33–42. Plan around the lower end of whichever band matters to you: if your daily round trip does not fit inside it with margin to spare, the range difference here is the deciding factor and you should pick the bigger battery. Recharging also differs: the Dualtron Victor Luxury 2.0 is back to full in about 4 hours against 10, which matters if you top up between a morning and evening commute rather than overnight. Whichever you choose, remember that both figures assume a fresh battery; a pack loses roughly 20–30% of its capacity after a couple of years of daily cycling, so a used example of either will fall short of these numbers.

Build & ride

Weight is where the daily reality lives: 107 lb against 82 lb, a 25 lb difference. If you carry the scooter up stairs or onto a train, the lighter Dualtron Victor Luxury 2.0 is the one you will actually keep using — the difference between a scooter that gets ridden and one that gathers dust is often a single flight of steps. Both run suspension at both ends, so both should ride comfortably over broken ground — a genuine point in common rather than a tie-breaker. Each publishes a water-resistance rating (IP66 and IPX5); the higher of the two shrugs off heavier rain, though neither should be ridden through standing water or pressure-washed. Tyres differ too: Phantom 2.0 Stellar (60V) runs tubeless and Victor Luxury 2.0 pneumatic. Pneumatic and tubeless tyres absorb more of the road than solid ones, at the cost of the occasional puncture; solid tyres never flat but pass more buzz into your hands and feet.

Price, score & value

The Dualtron Victor Luxury 2.0 is the cheaper of the two, $1,999 against $2,799 — a $800 gap. Whether that gap is worth closing depends entirely on whether the pricier scooter's advantages above line up with your priorities. Within their category the Dualtron Victor Luxury 2.0 scores higher (70/100 to 60/100). Remember that our scores are within-category judgements — this comparison is only meaningful because both sit in the same or an adjacent class. If value per dollar is your lens, use the cost-of-ownership calculator on this site: a slightly cheaper scooter with pneumatic tyres can cost more to run over a few years than a pricier one on solid tyres, and the sticker price alone hides that.

What the extra $800 buys

What these numbers actually govern

Here is what each of these measures controls in general — both the ones that separate these two and the ones they share. These describe the measure, not a claim about how either scooter rides, which we have not tested.

charge time

Charge time matters most if you top up between a morning and an evening commute rather than overnight.

nominal power

Nominal power describes sustained output: it shows up in acceleration and in holding speed on a long climb rather than in a higher top speed.

price

Price is the one figure that is not a specification — it moves with stock and promotions, so treat any gap as current rather than permanent.

weight

Weight decides the moments off the scooter: carrying it up a flight of stairs, lifting it onto transit, loading it into a car boot.

water resistance

An IP rating describes water resistance, not immersion — it covers rain and splashes, never standing water or a pressure washer.

Suspension (both dual)identical on both

Suspension is the component that most changes how a scooter handles broken pavement; where both models carry the same arrangement, road comfort is not a differentiator between them.

Drive (both Dual motor)identical on both

A second motor adds traction and acceleration at the cost of weight and battery drain. Where both use the same arrangement, drive layout is not a separator.

Price & where to buy

Who should buy which

Buy the Apollo Phantom 2.0 Stellar (60V) if you want more sustained power (6700 W vs 4250 W — a decisive 37% edge), or you ride in the wet (IP66 vs IPX5). Buy the Dualtron Victor Luxury 2.0 if you top up between commutes rather than overnight (4 h vs 10 h), or you want to spend less ($1,999 vs $2,799). Whichever you pick, 3 specifications are identical across both — voltage, suspension, drive — so those rows cannot decide it. Within their category our score puts the Dualtron Victor Luxury 2.0 at 70/100 against 60/100.

Bottom line: the Dualtron Victor Luxury 2.0 is the safer default here — it recharges faster (4 h vs 10 h). The Apollo Phantom 2.0 Stellar (60V) earns its place if more nominal power (6700 W vs 4250 W) matters more to you. Every figure here is the manufacturer's published claim or a value we compute from it, linked back to each maker's own specification so you can check it yourself.

Frequently asked questions