Updated · Data review
Prices are snapshots from our tracker and can change. We may earn a commission on purchases made through these links — this never affects rankings.
Purchase price plus estimated electricity and consumables (tyres, pads) over two years at roughly three charges a week. How we calculate this
Estimated at 55–70% of the claimed figure. Why the difference?
The Apollo Phantom 2.0 Stellar (60V) is a performance scooter that asks $2,799 for a claimed 56 miles of range and a 53 mph top speed. Whether that is the right trade for you comes down to three things: how far you actually ride, how much you have to carry the scooter, and how honest you are with yourself about range.
Apollo claims 56 miles. Treat that as a ceiling reached in a laboratory, not a number you will see. Manufacturers measure range with a light rider, a low steady speed, flat ground, mild weather and no wind — conditions that stack every variable in their favour. Applying our standard correction, we estimate a realistic 31–39 miles for the Phantom 2.0 Stellar (60V), and we show that band everywhere the claim appears so the two are never confused.
The honest way to compare range between scooters is the battery, not the claim. The Phantom 2.0 Stellar (60V) carries a 1800 Wh pack, which is better than most rivals. Watt-hours cannot be marketed around: a bigger pack out-lasts a smaller one on the same terrain regardless of what either brochure promises, and against a category median claim of 58 miles this model claims less than the typical model in its class.
Plan your commute around 31–39 miles. If your daily distance does not fit inside the lower figure with margin to spare, buy a scooter with a bigger battery rather than hoping for the claim.
The claimed top speed is 53 mph, among the best in its class. Peak output is 7000 W (6700 W nominal), split across two motors. Dual motors deliver stronger acceleration and better grip on loose or wet ground, at the cost of weight and battery drain.
Apollo rates it for a 46.6% incline. That is the figure to watch if your route has a real hill: an underpowered scooter does not just slow on a climb, it overheats and sags in range. This rating is high enough to take most urban bridges and overpasses without drama.
At 53 mph this is a fast machine. Braking, not power, becomes the specification that keeps you safe — see the ride-quality section below, and treat a helmet as mandatory rather than optional.
Suspension at both ends is the standout here, and it is the upgrade that most changes how a scooter feels on cracked city pavement. Air-filled 11-inch tubeless tyres absorb far more road buzz than solid ones and, being self-sealing, resist the punctures that plague pneumatic tyres.
Braking is handled by advanced hydraulic 4-piston brakes + power rbs™ (regenerativ. Hydraulic discs are the best you can ask for — strong, consistent and light at the lever, and worth prioritising above almost any other feature on a fast scooter.
The Phantom 2.0 Stellar (60V) carries an IP66 water-resistance rating, which we score at 100 of 100 on the build metric. That covers sustained rain and confident all-weather commuting — though no scooter should be jet-washed or ridden through standing water deep enough to reach the deck. A published IP rating is itself a good sign: manufacturers who test for water ingress put the number on the page, and its presence here means the figure was measured rather than hoped for.
The frame is rated to carry 330 lb. That is a generous ceiling that also signals a sturdier deck and stem, useful even for lighter riders who want longevity.
At 107 lb the Phantom 2.0 Stellar (60V) is below the class average (the typical performance scooter here is 90.5 lb). In everyday terms it is heavy enough that you should plan not to carry it far — think of it as something you roll and fold, not lift. Weight is the specification buyers most often ignore at purchase and most often regret afterwards, so be honest about how many stairs stand between you and where the scooter lives.
Apollo does not state UL2272 certification for this model on its specification page. UL2272 is the standard covering the scooter's electrical and battery system against fire, and its absence — whether the scooter is uncertified or simply undocumented — is worth resolving before you buy, particularly if you will charge or store it inside a shared building.
A full charge takes about 10 hours from the standard charger, which realistically means charging overnight rather than topping up between a morning and evening commute. If charge speed matters to you, ask whether a faster charger is offered, but weigh it against battery life: fast charging generates heat, and heat is what ages lithium cells.
Whatever the 1800 Wh pack, how long it lasts is mostly in your hands. Lithium batteries prefer to live between roughly 20% and 80% of charge; draining to empty and leaving it there, or storing it fully charged in a hot space, are the two habits that shorten a scooter's usable life the fastest. With the battery built in, treating it gently is the difference between a scooter that holds its range for years and one that fades in a season.
The sticker price is $2,799, but the number that matters is what it costs to keep. Over two years we estimate a total of $3,031 once you add electricity (roughly three charges a week at the US average rate) and consumables such as tyres, tubes and pads. That is an estimate for comparing models on the same basis, not a quote — but it reframes a cheap scooter with pneumatic tyres against a pricier one that may cost less to run.
Against a category median of $1,849, the Phantom 2.0 Stellar (60V) is at the premium end, so it needs to justify the gap on build and range rather than headline numbers alone.
We rank the Apollo Phantom 2.0 Stellar (60V) against every other performance scooter in the database on the same five measures — range, power, build, portability and value — each scored within the category so it competes with true peers rather than machines from a different price bracket. Its overall score is 60/100.
The comparison table on each ranking page lets you sort these side by side on whichever specification actually decides your purchase.
The Apollo Phantom 2.0 Stellar (60V) earns its place for a large battery for its class, proper weather sealing, dual suspension, and its main compromise is real heft to carry. It is a sensible choice provided its compromises line up with your priorities rather than against them. As always, every figure above is Apollo's published claim or a value we compute from it, linked back to the manufacturer's own page so you can verify any number yourself.
Figures the manufacturer does not publish are shown as “—”. We do not estimate them.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Top speed (claimed) | 53 mph |
| Nominal motor power | 6700 W |
| Peak motor power | 7000 W |
| Drive | Dual motor |
| Max incline | 46.6% |
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Claimed range | 56 mi |
| Estimated real-world range | 31–39 mi |
| Battery capacity | 1800 Wh |
| Voltage | 60 V |
| Capacity | 30 Ah |
| Charge time | 10 h |
| UL2272 certified | — |
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Weight | 107 lb |
| Max rider load | 330 lb |
| Tyres | 11" tubeless |
| Suspension | dual |
| Brakes | Advanced Hydraulic 4-Piston brakes + Power RBS™ (regenerativ |
| Water resistance | IP66 |
| Foldable | Yes |
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Display | D.O.T. 2.0 built-in display with anti-glare technology + pho |
| App support | — |
| Apple Find My | — |
| Turn signals | — |
Derived from the published specifications above.
Scores are percentile-ranked within the Performance category, weighted 25/25/20/15/15 over whichever components are published. A component we cannot compute is dropped and the weights renormalise — never scored as zero. Read the full method.
Scores compare models within their own category. A budget scooter's 90 and a performance scooter's 90 are not directly comparable.
This model's published specification does not fit the statutory definition in any of the 17 states we have verified — most commonly because its claimed top speed exceeds the figure written into the state's definition.
Falling outside a definition does not make a scooter illegal to own. It means the permissions written for that device class — bike-lane access, no registration, no insurance — do not apply to it as sold.
Check this scooter state by stateLocks fit any scooter — ranked on independent Sold Secure grade, not fit. Full, model-specific list: accessories for the Apollo Phantom 2.0 Stellar (60V).
Head-to-head with similar scooters:
Dualtron Victor Luxury 2.0 pairs a claimed 48 mph top speed, a claimed 60 miles of range, a 1890 Wh battery. Best suited to experienced riders who want genuine speed, anyone crossing rough ground.
Dualtron Thunder 3 pairs a claimed 63 mph top speed, a claimed 80 miles of range, a 2880 Wh battery. Best suited to experienced riders who want genuine speed, heavier riders.
Kaabo Mantis King GT pairs a claimed 43 mph top speed, a claimed 56 miles of range, a 1440 Wh battery. Best suited to experienced riders who want genuine speed, anyone crossing rough ground.
Apollo claims 56 miles. Manufacturers measure range at about a 165 lb rider, a low constant speed and on flat ground, so we estimate a realistic 31–39 miles. Heavier riders, hills, cold weather and higher speeds all push you towards the lower end.
The manufacturer's claimed top speed is 53 mph. That figure is measured under favourable conditions; rider weight and gradient both reduce it in practice.
It carries an IP66 water-resistance rating. That covers sustained rain, though no scooter should be submerged or pressure-washed.
It weighs 107 lb and is rated to carry up to 330 lb. Anything above roughly 50 lb is difficult to carry up stairs or lift onto public transport regularly.
It currently tracks at $2,799. Our value score compares its range, power, build and portability against other Performance models at their current prices, so it rewards specification per dollar rather than a low price alone. Check the price history above before buying — we track it over time.
Specifications taken from Apollo's official product page. Related: all Apollo scooters · overall ranking