Apollo Phantom 2.0 Stellar (60V) vs Segway SuperScooter GT3 Pro: Which Should You Buy? (2026)
The Apollo Phantom 2.0 Stellar (60V) and the Segway SuperScooter GT3 Pro land close enough on price and class to be genuine cross-shops — $2,799 against $2,700, and both sit in the performance class. Every figure below is the manufacturer's published claim or a value we compute from it; where a maker leaves a spec unpublished we show a dash rather than guess, and a blank is never counted against a scooter. One habit to carry into any range comparison is to halve the claim. The Phantom 2.0 Stellar (60V) claims 56 miles but realistically returns about 31–39. The sections that follow work through where each one leads, and the verdict above already names the pick for most buyers — the detail below is there to overturn it if your priorities differ.
Side by side
| Motor & speed | ||
| Top speed (claimed) | 53 mph✓ | 50 mph |
| Peak power | 7000 W | 7000 W |
| Nominal power | 6700 W✓ | 3400 W |
| Drive | Dual motor | Dual motor |
| Max incline | 46.6%✓ | 38% |
| Battery & range | ||
| Claimed range | 56 mi | — |
| Est. real-world range | 31–39 mi | — |
| Battery | 1800 Wh | 2160 Wh✓ |
| Charge time | 10 h | — |
| Build | ||
| Weight | 107 lb✓ | 117.1 lb |
| Max load | 330 lb | 330 lb |
| Suspension | dual | — |
| Brakes | Advanced Hydraulic 4-Piston brakes + Power RBS™ (regenerativ | — |
| Water resistance | IP66 | IPX6 |
| Tyres | 11" tubeless | 11" tubeless |
| Features | ||
| Score (within category) | 60/100✓ | 50/100 |
| Price | $2,799 | $2,700✓ |
A green ✓ marks the better figure on that row. “—” means the manufacturer does not publish it; a blank is never counted as a loss. Scores compare each model within its own category.
What the makers don't publish
Apollo publishes every specification we track for the Apollo Phantom 2.0 Stellar (60V). Segway (Ninebot) does not publish claimed range, charge time, suspension, and brake hardware for the Segway SuperScooter GT3 Pro — 4 of the 15 specifications we track. We show a dash for each of those rather than estimate, and a missing figure is never counted against a scooter in our scoring — the component is dropped and the remaining weights renormalise. Those rows cannot be compared head to head, so treat this as a comparison of what is published rather than a complete picture. If one of the unpublished figures is the one your decision turns on, ask the seller in writing before you buy: a maker that measures a specification usually states it, and silence is a reasonable prompt to look harder.
Motor & speed
The Apollo Phantom 2.0 Stellar (60V) is the faster of the pair, 53 mph against 50 mph — a 3 mph gap that shows on open stretches but rarely in traffic, where junctions and shared paths set the pace regardless of what the scooter can do. At the Phantom 2.0 Stellar (60V)'s speeds, braking matters more than the extra miles per hour: check the build section below, because stopping distance climbs faster than speed does. Motor output is broadly matched, so neither will feel dramatically stronger pulling away from a stop. The Apollo Phantom 2.0 Stellar (60V) also claims the steeper hill-climbing grade, worth noting if your commute has a real gradient rather than a gentle rise. Read any top-speed figure as a maximum reached under ideal conditions; rider weight and gradient both pull it down in the real world, so treat these numbers as a ceiling rather than a cruising promise.
Battery & range
Battery capacity is the honest way to compare range, because watt-hours cannot be marketed around: the Phantom 2.0 Stellar (60V) holds 1800 Wh and the SuperScooter GT3 Pro 2160 Wh. The Segway SuperScooter GT3 Pro's 20% larger pack will out-last the other on the same route whatever the two brochures claim, and it is the single number to trust most in this section. At least one of these does not publish a range figure on its official page, so we show a dash rather than invent one — treat a missing number as a reason to look harder before buying, and lean on the battery watt-hours where both are stated. Whichever you choose, remember that both figures assume a fresh battery; a pack loses roughly 20–30% of its capacity after a couple of years of daily cycling, so a used example of either will fall short of these numbers.
Build & ride
Weight is where the daily reality lives: 107 lb against 117.1 lb, a 10.1 lb difference. If you carry the scooter up stairs or onto a train, the lighter Apollo Phantom 2.0 Stellar (60V) is the one you will actually keep using — the difference between a scooter that gets ridden and one that gathers dust is often a single flight of steps. Only the Apollo Phantom 2.0 Stellar (60V) has suspension at both ends, the single upgrade that most changes how a scooter feels on cracked city pavement; the other leans on its tyres to take the edge off, which works but not as well. Each publishes a water-resistance rating (IP66 and IPX6); the higher of the two shrugs off heavier rain, though neither should be ridden through standing water or pressure-washed.
Price, score & value
The Segway SuperScooter GT3 Pro is the cheaper of the two, $2,700 against $2,799 — a $99 gap. Whether that gap is worth closing depends entirely on whether the pricier scooter's advantages above line up with your priorities. Within their category the Apollo Phantom 2.0 Stellar (60V) scores higher (60/100 to 50/100). Remember that our scores are within-category judgements — this comparison is only meaningful because both sit in the same or an adjacent class. If value per dollar is your lens, use the cost-of-ownership calculator on this site: a slightly cheaper scooter with pneumatic tyres can cost more to run over a few years than a pricier one on solid tyres, and the sticker price alone hides that.
What's identical
These two share more than they differ on. 5 published specifications are identical across both: peak power (7000 W), max load (330 lb), tyre type (tubeless), tyre size (11"), drive (Dual motor). That matters more than it first appears, because it narrows the decision to a short list: the 9 measures where they actually diverge — nominal power, suspension, water resistance and others — carry the whole choice. Anything on the identical list can be set aside: it will be the same experience whichever you buy, so it should not sway you either way.
- Peak power: 7000 W
- Max load: 330 lb
- Tyre type: tubeless
- Tyre size: 11"
- Drive: Dual motor
Where the Phantom 2.0 Stellar (60V) wins
The Apollo Phantom 2.0 Stellar (60V) carries more nominal power (6700 W vs 3400 W), has more suspension (dual vs none), is better sealed against water (IP66 vs IPX6), claims a steeper grade (46.6% vs 38%), is lighter to carry (107 lb vs 117.1 lb), and is faster (53 mph vs 50 mph). That is a meaningful spread of advantages, not a single headline number.
Where the SuperScooter GT3 Pro wins
The Segway SuperScooter GT3 Pro carries the bigger battery (2160 Wh vs 1800 Wh), runs a higher-voltage system (72 V vs 60 V), and costs less ($2,700 vs $2,799). Together those make it the stronger sheet in several areas.
What these numbers actually govern
Here is what each of these measures controls in general — both the ones that separate these two and the ones they share. These describe the measure, not a claim about how either scooter rides, which we have not tested.
- nominal power
- Nominal power describes sustained output: it shows up in acceleration and in holding speed on a long climb rather than in a higher top speed.
- suspension
- Suspension at both ends changes how a scooter handles broken pavement more than any other single component; a single unit covers one end only, and none leaves the tyres to do the work.
- water resistance
- An IP rating describes water resistance, not immersion — it covers rain and splashes, never standing water or a pressure washer.
- max incline
- A climbing grade is quoted under test conditions; a heavier rider reaches the limit sooner than the published figure suggests.
- battery capacity
- Watt-hours are the single best predictor of range, because capacity is the one range input that cannot be marketed around.
- Max load (both 330 lb)identical on both
- A load rating covers rider plus cargo, not the rider alone. Where both models publish the same limit, rider weight cannot separate them.
- Tyre type (both tubeless)identical on both
- Pneumatic and tubeless tyres absorb road imperfections that solid tyres pass into the deck; solid tyres trade that comfort for never puncturing. A shared construction means the same trade on both.
- Drive (both Dual motor)identical on both
- A second motor adds traction and acceleration at the cost of weight and battery drain. Where both use the same arrangement, drive layout is not a separator.
Price & where to buy
Prices are snapshots from our tracker and can change. We may earn a commission on purchases made through these links — this never affects rankings.
Prices are snapshots from our tracker and can change. We may earn a commission on purchases made through these links — this never affects rankings.
Who should buy which
Buy the Apollo Phantom 2.0 Stellar (60V) if you want more sustained power (6700 W vs 3400 W — a decisive 49% edge), or your roads are rough (dual suspension vs none). Buy the Segway SuperScooter GT3 Pro if you want the bigger battery (2160 Wh vs 1800 Wh — a clear 17% edge), or you want the higher-voltage system (72 V vs 60 V) for less sag under load. Whichever you pick, 5 specifications are identical across both — peak power, max load, tyre type — so those rows cannot decide it. Within their category our score puts the Apollo Phantom 2.0 Stellar (60V) at 60/100 against 50/100.
Bottom line: the Apollo Phantom 2.0 Stellar (60V) is the safer default here — it carries more nominal power (6700 W vs 3400 W). The Segway SuperScooter GT3 Pro earns its place if the bigger battery (2160 Wh vs 1800 Wh) matters more to you. Every figure here is the manufacturer's published claim or a value we compute from it, linked back to each maker's own specification so you can check it yourself.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Apollo Phantom 2.0 Stellar (60V) or the Segway SuperScooter GT3 Pro better overall?
Within their category, the Apollo Phantom 2.0 Stellar (60V) scores 60/100 and the Segway SuperScooter GT3 Pro scores 50/100. Our scores compare models within their own category, and the two are close enough here that your priorities — carry weight, range, price — should decide it rather than the raw number.
Which one has better real-world range?
At least one of these models does not publish a range figure on its official page, so we do not estimate a real-world band for it. Compare the battery watt-hours where both are published.
Which is cheaper to buy?
The Segway SuperScooter GT3 Pro is the cheaper of the two at $2,700 against $2,799. Prices are tracked snapshots and can change — check the current figure on each model's page before buying.
Which is easier to carry and store?
The Apollo Phantom 2.0 Stellar (60V) is lighter at 107 lb versus 117.1 lb, so it is the better pick if you carry a scooter up stairs or onto transit. Both fold for storage; weight is the deciding factor here, not folded size.
Can I ride either one in the rain?
Both publish a water rating — Phantom 2.0 Stellar (60V) is IP66 and SuperScooter GT3 Pro is IPX6. Higher ratings (IPX6, IP66) handle sustained rain; IPX4–IPX5 covers light rain and splashes but not a downpour. Neither should be submerged or pressure-washed.
Full specifications and sources: Apollo Phantom 2.0 Stellar (60V) · Segway SuperScooter GT3 Pro